... a personal e-mail of former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton recently leaked by WikiLeaks suggested an adviser, Jake Sullivan, once shared with her an article titled “To save our economy, ditch Taiwan” by Paul Kane, a former international security research fellow at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. [Emphasis added]
In the article, Kane suggested that US President Barack Obama could bolster US economic security by ending its military assistance and arms sales to Taiwan, in exchange for a write-off of US$1.14 trillion in US debt held by China.
“I saw [Paul Kane's proposal to sell out Taiwan] and thought it was so clever. Let’s discuss,” said Clinton... [Emphasis added]
The veracity of this is open to question, given Wikileaks' status as a likely Russian front group. It would therefore be helpful if America's supine press asked Secretary Clinton to confirm or deny whether it would have been the policy of her government to stab fellow democracies in the back.
Helpful, yes. But it's pretty difficult to picture this planeload of throne-sniffers ever asking the Haggard Queen any tough questions:
Postscript: Paul Kane's from the JFK School of Government? For real?
"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty...Offer not applicable if one trillion dollar bribes are on the table." —John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Inaugural Address, probably
UPDATE: The original Wikileaks document. Not much different from the Taipei Times' account, though it does include Paul Kane's article in its entirety.
"A German regional court in the city of Wuppertal affirmed a lower court decision last Friday stating that a violent attempt to burn the city's synagogue by three men in 2014 was a justified expression of criticism of Israel’s policies."
"The court sentenced the three [Muslim men responsible for the arson] ... to suspended sentences."
An evil fate awaits Jews in Eurabia, given the anti-Semitism of European natives and the unbridled Judenhass of the continent's new Muslim rapefugees.
Israel awaits. Best get out, while the gettin's good.
UPDATE (Jan 14, 2017): Buildings in Germany which are still illegal to burn down:
Not hard to see which castes belong to the over-class, and which are untouchables.
No, as Father Bauer of Taiwan's China Post admonishes, we must look elsewhere for the root cause. And clearly that reason cannot be Original Sin or Man's hubris or even demonic religious doctrines, but in France's appalling lack of blade licensing and sensible knife control.
BLM chanting, "Pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon."
So if I understand FBI Director James Comey correctly, Hillary Clinton was grossly negligent with classified information...but shouldn't be prosecuted for the felony of gross negligence because she wasn't intentionally negligent...
To be perfectly fair, Donald Trump with the nuclear football isn't particularly reassuring, either.
"...the practice of killing dogs by beating, burning and other painful methods [is performed] in the belief that dying by torture makes their meat taste better."
The 27th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre came and went this year. Over at Taiwan's China Post, Father Bauer observed the occasion by asking when the Chinese government would make a full "disclosure of official records, names of officials who ordered and supervised the violence, and a clear listing of the names of the victims."
He further wondered:
"Why do people pretend that a political system that rolls tanks and artillery out against civilians without weapons represents a government worthy of our admiration or (is such a word possible?) affection?"
If he truly would like an answer, he could do worse than to ask his fellow China Post colleague, "Traitor Joe" Hung.
Because "Traitor Joe" commemorated the date by calling for an invasion and occupation of his home country of Taiwan by the very same Communist Party that slaughtered unarmed Chinese citizens 27 years ago:
"After the conquest [of Taiwan], China would rule Taiwan as a province as Japan did from 1895 to 1945. The Japanese colonizers did improve the life of the colonized a great deal. The Chinese conquerors would outperform the Japanese."
"Perhaps, it may be much better to be conquered for Taiwan's next generation and those after them. All's well that ends well."
Traitors gonna trait.
"And finally, it's got to have a good beat so waiguoren can dance to it if they want to."
— Xi Xinping, on requirements for China's latest propaganda video
Young Taiwanese songstress waves Republic of China flag; washed-up elderly Taiwanese musician dutifully reports her to his Beijing masters.
Accusations that the Taiwanese member of the South Korean pop group TWICE, Chou Tzu-yu (周子瑜), was a “pro-Taiwanese independence” activist has caused China’s Huawei Technologies Co (華為) to demand LG Uplus drop Chou from endorsing its Y6 chain of cellphones.
Hey, remember that "1992 Consensus" -- the one which allows that there's only one China, but China & Taiwan are both free to define that One China however they wish?
You didn't really believe that fairy-tale bullshit now, did you?
If you were stupid enough to believe it, just picture poor little 16-year-old Chou Tzu-yu, who in her innocence, thought it was OK to define One China as Taiwan, and wave her country's flag.
Let us return to learn a little more about Huang An, shall we?
Huang, despite being Taiwanese by birth, began developing his career in China in the late 1990s. Huang has made a name for himself in recent years by informing the Chinese government and netizens about what he regards as pro-Taiwanese independence individuals and their activities. [emphasis added]
Bravo, Huang An. It's not everyone who can boast of possessing Taiwan's most punchable face:
Once Huang's treachery became known, he immediately ran under the skirts of "former" Taiwanese mob boss Chang An-le.
Because, you know: punchable face.
Meanwhile, Huang has returned to Taiwan ahead of the Lunar New Year holiday and is said to be fearing for his safety [from angry Taiwanese]. Huang has reportedly written to former Bamboo Union (竹聯幫) gang leader Chang An-le (張安樂), known as “the White Wolf,” asking for protection.
There is a story - probably apocryphal - which says that some years after sentencing Socrates to death, the citizens of Athens repented of their decision. Unable to restore life to the old man after the fact, they did the next best thing: they shunned one of his prosecutors.
This was more severe than it sounds, for it went beyond mere social disapprobation. As part of this informal punishment, they refused to have anything to do with him -- not even buying or selling or engaging in the simplest of commerce.
Under these conditions, the prosecutor of Socrates was unable to procure so much as a crust of bread to sate his hunger, and is said to have starved to death within a week.
Just throwin' that out there...
UPDATE: A stunned and pallid Chou Tzu-yu bows and apologizes, lifelessly reading a scripted self-criticism straight out of the Mao Tse-tung era.
It's like watching an ISIS captive ritually denouncing his home country at gunpoint. About the only thing missing is her eyelids blinking out in Morse code:
Of course, I don't know Morse code, so maybe I missed it.
UPDATE #2: Huang An represents Chinese nationalism at its finest.
Call me crazy, but I don't think the Communist Party's brutal decision to demand this the day before Taiwan's presidential election is going to win the CCP's preferred candidate Eric Chu (KMT) any votes.
This is the "friendly" cross-Strait relations the KMT has been bragging about?
UPDATE #3: Like many other snakes, Huang An has a detachable lower jaw. In this photo, the ophidian Huang illustrates the girth of the Chinese Communist phalluses he routinely fellates.
Looking forward to seeing how Joe Hung of Taiwan's China Post puts an erudite gloss on this latest of ISIS's Nazi-like enormities.
China and many other nations of Asia hope the [United States' next president] can shift back to the Middle East again to contain the newly formed caliphate by peaceful means rather than force of arms. [Emphasis added]
Well, we all make mistakes. Best let this one slide.
Guess there's something to be said about Obama's Vulcan shtick.
UPDATE (December 11, 2015):
A bored, listless, pro-forma statement.
Infidels, he's just not that into you.
Al Jazeera employee Hashem Said lays down Sharia Law to all you dirty kuffar out there: it's haram to show the face of murderous Muslim cunt Tashfeen Malik:
Little did Said know at the time, but Malik's family may indeed be on trial. For it strains credibility to claim that mama Farook and the rest of their clan were unaware of Syed's bomb lab and 12 pipe bombs, while there are also questions about mama Farook's membership in an Islamic caliphate society.
A day after these tweets, the Farook family recognized their legal vulnerability and wisely lawyered up.
We don't care about appeasing the dictates of your dirty terrorist culture, Said.
UPDATE (December 9, 2015): Don't look now, but papa Farook was placed on terror watch list two days ago.
Really glad I waited a day or two before commenting on the San Bernardino massacre. Unlike some other folks...
BTW, there are new claims that Obama's peeps (the San Bernardino terrorists) received $28,500 prior to their Christmas party massacre.
Which if true, puts a high-powered assault rifle bullet through the whole "Lone-Wolves" theory.
UPDATE (December 9, 2015): Syed Farook's received $28,500 not from overseas, but from an online lender.
Regardless, the care he took to remove or destroy evidence of his electronic trail suggests he was attempting to hide his contacts from authorities.
UPDATE (December 16, 2015): How the Obama administration shitcanned investigations into American Muslim terrorist groups.
On the one hand, Tashfeen Malik slaughtered 7 civilians and wounded 10, leaving her 6 month-old daughter an orphan.
While on the other hand, Linda Stasi of the NY Daily News slimes victims of terror by likening them to their murderers.
I shit you not:
Say, is this a game anybody can play?
Apparently so. Where's child protective services when ya need 'em?
Recall that Linda Stasi argued there were only THIRTEEN innocent victims.
Call me crazy, but perhaps she shouldn't have stepped over that barricade in the first place. Linda, maybe you should try that next time.
Her lawsuit claims:
Stasi's injuries, the complaint says, left her "severely injured and damaged, rendered sick, sore, lame and disabled." Additionally she suffered "severe nervous shock and mental anguish, great physical pain and emotional upset."
She was also unable to malign massacre victims for several days afterwards.
UPDATE #3: The Foreigner isn't a gun guy, and is receptive to reasonable gun control measures. But I get where Schlichter's coming from:
UPDATE (December 7, 2015): Linda Stasi's record of blaming the victims of Muslim terrorism.
UPDATE (December 10, 2015): That time Donald Trump joined Linda Stasi in blaming the victims of Muslim terror:
Heckuva job, DHS!
For [Tashfeen Malik's] visa application [to live in the United States], the address she listed in her Pakistani hometown, ABC News discovered today, does not exist. [Emphasis added]
[Tashfeen] Malik, 27, belonged to an educated, politically influential family from Karor Lal Esan in Layyah district. Malik Ahmad Ali Aulakh, one of her father’s cousins, was a provincial minister from 2008-13.
Residents said the Aulakh family is known to have connections to militant Islam.
As they like to say at Obama's Department of Homeland Security, nobody who lies about their address and has connections to militant Islam could be a bad person!
UPDATE (December 6, 2015): All is well, remain calm, everything is under control:
At least 72 employees at the Department of Homeland Security are listed on the U.S. terrorist watch list, according to a Democratic lawmaker.
UPDATE #3: Obama's FBI is really on the ball, too.
UPDATE (December 7, 2015):
UPDATE (December 9, 2015): The original title of this post was, Time For Public Hangings At The Department Of Homeland Security.
Musta been really tired and angry.
Public hangings? Oh my, really?
Not gonna apologize for being angry, but that was a bit over the top and inflammatory.
For the record, there will be NO public hangings over these lethal fuckups at Obama's Department of Homeland Security.
(Nor, one suspects, will there be so much as a single private reprimand, either...)
UPDATE (December 15, 2015):
UPDATE (December 16, 2015):
(Image from the Democratic Underground)
You know how much Barack Obama's "thoughts and prayers" are worth if he continues to allow Muslim terrorists to enter the States?
UPDATE: The comedy routine which seems to have inspired the prayer-shaming movement:
Hmm. Democrats must have the next election in the bag, so clearly they don't need votes from the drooling, inbred Jeebus-lover crowd:
Nevertheless, as an atheist myself, I can sympathize with the desire for solutions over platitudes. And so in the spirit of that, I make a simple proposal following the terrorist attack at San Bernardino:
End ALL Muslim immigration. NOW.
Because the time for meaningless platitudes is indeed over.
UPDATE: Just tracked down one more of those jerks who offers "thoughts and prayers" during mass casualty events.
I mean, what a total asshole, amirite?
And for the sake of completeness, this monster's latest violation of all that is good and politically-correct:
"Our first order of business is to send our thoughts and prayers to those who have been killed."
— Obama on the San Bernardino massacre (Dec 3, 2015)
The coordinated attack [on offering "thoughts and prayers" for victims & their families] seems to have three goals: One, to simply bait and troll religious people, Two, to show how trite and silly common people are with their second-hand sentiments (and how elevated the critic of such sentiments is), and Three, that while the rightwing can only offer "thoughts and prayers" in response to a mass shooting, leftwing politicians offer action...
UPDATE (December 6, 2015):
If there's a murderous, anti-Western, anti-democratic government to be found, Joe Hung will be there to lick its boots. Or sandals, as the case may be.
Barack Obama should stop his Crusade against ISIS now, demands Hung:
Obama still has time to reconsider [his] new Crusade, lest he should repeat President Bush's folly by getting the United States mired ever more deeply in the Middle East quagmire.
A competent historian would never say Obama was engaged in a Crusade, for the simple reason that Obama's not trying to recover formerly Christian lands in the Middle East.
(It helps, when one accuses another of launching a Crusade, to have some familiarity with the actual DEFINITION of the word...)
Moving along, ISIS's grotesque little apologist in Taipei asserts the Islamofascist group cannot be fought because it's invincible:
Even supposing the new Crusaders succeeded in toppling the IS caliphate, suicidal terrorism could never be stopped. Caliph al Baghdadi has ordered a jihad. There would not be any lack of mujahideen. Hundreds of thousands of his followers are willing and ready to die in a holy war against the Western imperialists who they believe are launching the new Crusade.
No, 'fraid not. A caliph's religious and political legitimacy rests necessarily upon his control over TERRITORY. Remove his control over land and his legitimacy vanishes. After which, the orders of a phony caliph carry no weight.
Speaking of al-Baghdadi's legitimacy, supermajorities in Middle Eastern countries have a unfavorable opinion of ISIS and regard al-Baghdadi's self-proclaimed position as illegitimate. Read into it what you will that an agnostic Confucian like Joe Hung finds al-Baghdadi more legitimate than the vast majority of Muslims do.
Finally, Joe Hung suggests that because ISIS is invincible, it should be left alone to bring peace to the region, the way the Ottoman Caliphate did in years previous:
There was no trouble in the Middle East while the caliphs of the Ottoman Empire ruled it for more than 400 years.
This is all highly unconvincing, since according to Islamic law, a caliph is REQUIRED to wage at least one war every year against Infidel nations.
An ISIS caliphate is therefore likely to create A GREAT DEAL of trouble outside the Middle East, regardless of what happens inside. (Just as the Ottomans made incessant war on Eastern Europe and the Balkans.)
And as for his fanciful prospects of ISIS pacifying the Middle East, Joe Hung forgets the presence of 6 million Jews and many more million Shiites in the region, whom ISIS is unlikely to leave unmolested.
Um, you said "rapes" twice.
POSTSCRIPT: Joe Hung invents "facts" to satisfy his narrative:
As a matter of fact, one result of the Crusades, during which Jews were massacred by Crusaders in a pogrom, was the birth of Zionism, which finally triumphed with the creation of Israel. [Emphasis added]
Comrade Historian is apparently unaware that Zionism (like many other forms of nationalism) was largely a product of the 19th century.
The other day Barack Obama publicly praised Taiwan for its humanitarian contributions for refugees from the Syrian and Iraqi civil wars, leading Taiwanese who would normally not agree with each other to react with anger and alarm at being placed into ISIS's crosshairs.
...Obama's statement has not generated the [favorable] traffic that might be expected on [Taiwanese] social media. When it is mentioned, Obama's Taiwan mention is...greeted with a "why us?" analysis.
The U.S. president knows full well that naming Taiwan in such a way will, to a degree, put Taiwan on the terrorists' map...
And second, Taiwanese nationalists at the Taipei Times:
US President Barack Obama naming Taiwan as one of the US’ partners in the global battle against terrorism might have come across as a nod to the nation’s aid to Syrian refugees to some, but his remarks at the East Asia Summit in Kuala Lumpur were not only hypocritical, but have put the nation in danger of being targeted by Muslim extremists.
As with any talks at the international level, the two parties [KMT & DPP], intentionally or otherwise, have sent a clear message not only to IS, but also to Obama: “Keep Taiwan out of your fight.”
I'm gonna zag where readers might expect me to zig, and defend Obama on this one. (Or rather, not so much defend him as to place the blame elsewhere -- on Ma Ying-jeou and Taiwan's KMT government.)
Taiwan's humanitarian contributions to alleviate the Syrian crisis are presumably not on some sort of top-secret budget, but are a matter of public knowledge in Taiwan as well as parts of the Middle East. The China Post elucidates the composition of Taiwan's aid:
The nation donated prefabricated houses, LED lamps and medical supplies worth nearly US$10 million in recent years in humanitarian assistance through the U.S. and relevant countries to refugees and other people affected by terrorism and war in the Middle East, according [to Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs].
It seems to me that if the Taiwanese government wanted its donations kept on the q.t., the onus was on it to communicate this wish -- clearly & firmly -- to the U.S.
It certainly had ample time to do so...YEARS of time, in fact.
So yes, Obama should be faulted for not understanding how ISIS's attacks on one U.S. ally (France) might cause nervousness on the part of a lesser player like Taiwan. But that does not absolve Ma Ying-jeou's administration from the responsibility it had for informing the American government about its desire to avoid the attention of the monstrous Islamofascist organization, ISIS.
Amidst all the finger-pointing at Barack Obama, the KMT's failure in this matter should not forgotten, either.
POSTSCRIPT: I've even seen a "Downfall" parody on this subject. Not knowing Chinese, I can't speak to its quality or lack thereof.
Also, IS does not consider Taiwan an enemy. The monetary and humanitarian support Taiwan gives the American-led coalition is insignificant. The new caliphate feels no need to retaliate against Taiwan.
How do you know that? You got a secret hotline to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi?
And if so, do you believe everything he tells you?
A new report by Congress says more than 250 Americans have attempted to join ISIS, and one in four of them is from Minnesota, many of them former refugees. [Emphasis added]
Letting more in sounds like stupid stuff.
UPDATE (November 29, 2015): The Taipei Times ran an opinion piece falsely equating opposition to Western settlement of Syrian refugees with the wartime internment of Japanese-Americans.
What the writer of the piece fails to understand is that during war, one does not invite foreign nationals from hostile countries to settle in one's territory because of the obvious security threat. What is less obvious is that Japanese-Americans -- not foreign nationals, but American citizens -- required internment. (Particularly since German-Americans and Italian-Americans were not subject to the same requirement.)
I contend that citizens of Western nations have a right to have a say in their countrys' immigration policies, and are well within their rights to reject immigration of refugees who are anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and anti-atheist.
Finally, it should also be noted that Taiwan has not offered to settle Syrian refugees in its territory, and that some of Taiwan's politicians resist immigration from Communist China on similar grounds (namely, due to national security concerns as well as the pro-unification attitudes presumably held by such immigrants).
Also, please keep a safe distance from collapsing narratives.
Note how this nutjob rants that Islam's been falsely blamed for the murder of Frenchmen...and then later calls upon his foul deity to exterminate every living Frenchman.
UPDATE (December 1, 2015): Is that you, Bevin Chu? Another Muslim cleric claims the Paris attacks were a false flag operation.
"Persisting with selective memory, fuzzy logic and contrived debates is what sustains global terrorism."
Really? Now, I would have guessed that al-Baghdadi and al-Zawahiri are motivated less by "selective memory, fuzzy logic and contrived debates" and more by Islamic Supremacist ideology. But what Mr. Amin says must be true, since it was published in a KMT funny paper.
Adnan R. Amin, words cannot express the anguish I feel over my PC WrongThink. Rest assured I shall spend the next several months wracked with grief, spending long sleepless nights tossing and turning in nightmares of guilt.
How dare I condemn as "terrorists" men who send death squads into nightclubs to gun down scores of civilians? Should men who rape infidel women purchased in slave markets really be considered "terrorists"?
Well, I used to think so. But thanks to Adnan R. Amin, I have come to see the error of my ways. Praise be to Adnan R. Amin!
And so I do make this solemn vow: Never again shall this lowly First Worlder hurt the all-important feelings of men I once referred to as terrorists by calling them "terrorists".
Nope. From now on I shall only use the Obama-approved term for brave warriors of the Religion Of Peace™: namely, "widows-and-orphans".
UPDATE: Well, looky here. ISIS itself refers to its people as "Soldiers Of Terror".
So at this point, I'm kinda thinkin' that if ISIS calls its own footsoldiers "terrorists", then it's probably OK for everyone else, too.
And I'm also kinda thinkin'...that Adnan R. Amin is terrorist apologist who's full of shit.
UPDATE (November 22, 2015): I was awfully harsh on Adnan R. Amin in writing this post last night. But I think my reaction was entirely justified.
What Adnan R. Amin is attempting to do is destroy the very valuable civilizational norm that prohibits sending death squads to massacre civilians. That's not really terrorism, says Adnan R. Amin, it's...well, he doesn't say. Legitimate resistance, perhaps?
But once people begin excusing Muslims deliberately targeting and massacring Infidel civilians, others will follow their lead and excuse terrorist massacres of Muslim civilians.
And we'll wind up with more Anders Breiviks.
UPDATE (November 23, 2015): The mind boggles:
There's been a certain amount of hyperbole on this blog of late regarding refugees from Syria. This has been somewhat unavoidable, given the fact that virtually every day over the past week some monstrous new outrage has been perpetrated by Muslim radicals somewhere across the globe.
So it must be said that, of course, not every Muslim is a terrorist. But it must also be admitted that Western nations will not merely be accepting "widows and orphans." It is therefore inevitable that there will be some finite number of terrorists mingled within the cohort of refugees that are granted asylum. So the question is: How can we estimate this number?
Fortunately, this poll from the Doha Institute can give us a general idea. The following chart illustrates the number of Syrian refugees who have a favorable view of the Islamofascist group known as ISIS:
(Image from page 19 of "The Military Campaign Against The Islamic State In Iraq And The Levant: Arab Public Opinion")
As can be seen, 13% of Syrian refugees have a favorable or partly favorable view of ISIS. If America accepts 10,000 Syrian refugees, 1,300 of them will view the terrorist group favorably to some extent. I contend that, at the very least, such views will not be conducive to good citizenship among these thirteen hundred people.
(Obviously, the situation faced by Germany is far worse, which can expect 104,000 of 800,000 Syrian refugees to have somewhat favorable views of ISIS.)
However, only 4% of Syrian refugees view ISIS with full approval, so America can expect to receive only 400 hardcore ISIS supporters. (While Germany faces the nightmarish prospect of receiving 32,000 ISIS partisans concentrated within a far smaller geographical area -- a veritable small invasion force, should it ever be so motivated.)
But most likely, support for ISIS will not translate into action for the vast majority of even hardcore supporters, so only a small fraction of America's 400 (or Germany's 32,000) can be expected to turn to terrorism.
I'm tempted to put that fraction at 1%, but that would simply be a wild guess.
POSTSCRIPT: The above analysis makes a number of assumptions:
1) There are no ISIS infiltrators mingled in with genuine refugees. I believe there will most certainly be a few, but I have no basis whatsoever for estimating their number.
2) The refugees have zero support for other terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda or al-Nusra. It is clearly nonsensical to suppose so, but the poll did not ask refugees whether they supported other terrorist groups, and more importantly, the refugees were not asked about their support for ALL terrorist groups in general.
Given that al-Qaeda & al-Nusra is said to be more popular that ISIS among Syrian refugees, I think it reasonable to add 25% to the final numbers (425 hardcore terrorist supporters in the U.S., and 40,000 in Germany).
(If I was hyping the numbers I suppose I could double them, but it must be remembered that a large number of ISIS supporters will most likely view al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups favorably as well. Due to the considerable overlap, the stated additional 25% seems more reasonable.)
3) Governments are completely ineffective in screening against ISIS supporters. An indeterminate number will no doubt be weeded out, should members of the bureaucracy be inclined to do so.
However, I'm left with a disquieting thought: In some PC quarters, firebrands and holders of extreme views are thought to represent a more "authentic" (and therefore, more desirable) type of Islam. And so I ask: Is it possible that portions of the bureaucracy might in fact positively select IN FAVOR of individuals predisposed to conducting terrorist acts against their newly adopted countries?
UPDATE (November 21, 2015): Greek security forces insist discerning terrorists from legitimate refugees is almost impossible.
Hope and Change involves a lot more catastrophic blood loss than I was led to believe.
Including 57 Democrats. Interesting.
But my working assumption is still that Obama will get his way, regardless of public opposition.
Shades of Neville Chamberlain's Phony War here:
Presumably, no warnings were issued beforehand...
Don't blame him for the crimes of his evil twin.
POSTSCRIPT: I know nothing about the provenance of these photos, and some skepticism is in order. But even assuming the worst (ie: that they're faked or exaggerated), the larger point that terrorists wish to gain entry into America still nonetheless holds true.
Several dozen suspected terrorist bombmakers, including some believed to have targeted American troops, may have mistakenly been allowed to move to the United States as war refugees, according to FBI agents investigating the remnants of roadside bombs recovered from Iraq and Afghanistan. [emphasis added]
At this stage, I'm not sure why any Jew would wish to remain in France, or in Europe in general. The writing's on the wall, for all to see.
The rest of you have angered Him greatly. Report immediately to local indoctrination camps for mandatory sensitivity training and frontal obotomies:
Fifty-three percent of U.S. adults in the survey, conducted in the days immediately following the attacks [by Muslim death squads in Paris], say the nation should not continue a program to resettle up to 10,000 Syrian refugees. Just 28 percent would keep the program with the screening process as it now exists, while 11 percent said they would favor a limited program to accept only Syrian Christians while excluding Muslims...
Summing up American views of Obama's Syrian refugee relocation plan:
Increasingly isolated (even within his own party) and with only 28% popular support for his terrorist importation scheme, little wonder Barack Obama's rhetoric has become so strident of late.
"Apparently [Republicans] are scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America. At first, they were too scared of the press being too tough on them in the debates. Now they are scared of 3-year-old orphans. That doesn't seem so tough to me." [Emphasis added]
Said the big, tough guy who imprisons makers of crappy YouTube videos.†
But Barack Obama did say something I found myself agreeing with:
"We are not well served when, in response to a terrorist attack, we descend into fear and panic," Obama said. "We don't make good decisions if it's based on hysteria or an exaggeration of risks."
There, you're absolutely right. No reasonable person could disagree with tha--- OH FUCK!!!!! DID THAT NICE YOUNG TSARNAEV REFUGEE-BOY JUST BLOW THAT MAN'S FUCKING LEG OFF?!?
Why, yes. Yes, he did.
Your transparent guilt-trip only works when people stop caring about their loved ones, Barry.
Let me know when that happens.
† And who's protected by a large Secret Service detail. And who pisses his pants when answering questions from Fox News...
UPDATE (November 22, 2015): Legally, the Tsarnaev family were permitted to remain in the U.S. not because they were refugees but because they claimed political asylum.
The ultimate point still holds: They were granted residency for humanitarian reasons, and repaid America's kindness by butchering Americans.
The Paris attacks came on the first day of the Muslim lunar month of Safar, which coincides with the anniversary of the Prophet Mohammed’s first successful “ghazva” (raid) against the “infidel” at Safwan in 623 AD.
2) The killers may have been hopped up on a type of amphetamine popular in the Middle East. That's speculation rather than fact at this point -- we'll have to hear what the French drug lab says.
At a soccer game again. This time in Turkey. (Praising Allah for the Muslim death squads, and booing for the victims.)
You know, they sound like really good neighbors. Let's let 'em immigrate and give 'em citizenship!
Remember: If you see something, don't say anything.
Boris doesn't give one hour warnings.
UPDATE (November 27, 2015): The Daily Mail claims this fighter was affiliated with al-Qaeda, and was hit by an artillery shell from Assad forces.
How very sporting of you, old man!
In Abu Kamal, U.S. planes dropped leaflets before the attack [on 300 fuel trucks], warning people [combatants and non-combatants alike]...to leave before the assault began. After waiting for an hour, the U.S. planes struck.
As a result of Obama's traitorous heads up, ISIS saved 184 of 300 fuel trucks that were lined up in rows. That's 184 trucks that can continue to ship oil and generate income for the most virulently evil organization of our time...
No wonder ISIS sends Muslim death squads to attack the West: They think they can attack with impunity because we're being led by a GODDAMN-FUCKING-PUSSY.
And, given the inept prosecution of the war by this cretinous incompetent, one cannot say they're mistaken.
The man's unfit for office.
The tell-all memoirs of this president's subordinates are going to be brutal.
UPDATE (November 17, 2015): A few more observations about Obama's farcical prosecution of the war against ISIS:
UPDATE (November 20, 2015):
Heckling a moment of silence for victims of Muslim death squads is a really bad idea. Crap like that is not going to lead to very happy conclusion. Should this ever happen again, don't look for sympathy and bitch about "Islamophobia" when irate Infidels start throwing fists. Or worse.
Your friendly neighborhood Foreigner In Formosa
First they came for the cartoonists
But I said the victims brought it on themselves
(Because I wasn't a cartoonist,
and that's what comes from poking mad dogs with sticks.)
Then they came for the Yazidi women
But I said spread your pretty legs
and think of Holy Prophet Mohammed
(Because I wasn't Yazidi,
and boys will be boys.) †
Then they came for the Jews
But I said these were "random attacks"
(Because I wasn't a Jew,
and those Zionazis should get the hell out of Palestine, anyway)
Finally, they came
for young, bohemian leftists at rock concerts
(People just like me...)
And I said:
"Holy shit, I just invited 800,000 of these bloodthirsty orcs
to colonize my country!"
(Image from 9gag.com)
† This part doesn't quite work, because (unlike the other "quotes") no one's ever said it.
But the curious thing is that President Barack Obama has never spoken against the practice of sexual slavery by ISIS. Which is odd, since he spoke very animatedly about the right of French Muslim women to wear the hijab, and was elected in 2012 partly on the basis of his opposition to some sort of "War Against Women".
So if I understand Obama correctly, prohibition of the hijab is akin to a dreadful crime against humanity...but selling Yazidi and Christian women in slave markets is a trifle not worth speaking of.
More evidence that Barack Obama doesn't care about Infidel people.