British Islamofascist Umran Javed was convicted of soliciting murder after he tried to convince a jury that his cries of, "Bomb, bomb Denmark! Bomb, bomb U.S.A.!" during the Danish Mo-toon crisis were merely harmless slogans, and that he didn't LITERALLY mean what he said.
Greg Gutfield has a bit of helpful advice:
In the future, radical fundamentalists (or Radfuns, for short) could avoid confusion by shouting, instead: "Bomb, bomb Denmark, Bomb, Bomb USA, in a purely figurative sense, of course!" [Emphasis added]
Doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, but sometimes ya gotta CYA.
(I believe video of Javed and his fellow Gandhi-wannabees can be found here.)
All this reminded me of a Dec 7/06 China Post editorial, which defended the right of members of the Taiwanese military to threaten the president of their country with death:
A drillmaster was recently arrested for participating in an anti-President Chen Shui-bian rally in September wearing his full dress uniform and for distributing a letter in which he stated the "army will turn their guns inwards" [on the president in the event of a war]...
A member of the MILITARY participated in a political rally? I'd say that's Strike #1. Strike 2 would be doing it in full dress uniform. And handing out literature saying that in wartime, the Taiwanese army would SIDE WITH COMMUNIST CHINA and kill the Taiwanese president?
Strike 3, you're outta there.
But that's just the way I see it. The China Post however, invoked the Umran Javed Defense:
In our opinion, the remark "the army will turn their guns inwards" was meant mainly to remind the public of a danger and can hardly be interpretted as the incitement of a rebellion.
No wonder the capitulationist People First Party threatened to freeze the entire budget of the Ministry of National Defense for putting Tung in the brig. Why, the way the paper put it, the man's a HERO.
And if you disagree, you're obviously some kind of fascist, or something:
What happened to Tung became a focus of attention because his arrest smacks of a return to martial law rule.
[...]
[It] reflects an attempt by the government to suppress the display of discontent by members of the Armed Forces. The attempt is a violation of human rights and represents a slip back on the road to democracy.
Expect the China Post to do a major rethink on this issue if a KMT president is elected in '08. At that point, it'll suddenly become VERY UNCOOL for the army to "turn its guns inward".
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE (Jan 11/06): Thanks go to Tim Maddog, for finding the link to the China Post editorial in question. Truth be told, my biggest concern in writing this post was that readers unfamiliar with Taiwan might think I was distorting the Post's position, or even making the whole thing up.
The link has been added, so readers can decide for themselves.