On Monday, Taiwan's KMT mouthpiece newspaper, The China Post, came out and admitted that Taiwan's KMT president Ma Ying-jeou is a liar. But that's OK, Ma's boosters at the paper said -- because no one should ever have believed a word the guy said to begin with!
Boy, with friends like these . . .
President Ma Ying-jeou offered an open apology to the people on Thursday. In a TV interview, the president said he was sorry he has let the people down by failing to keep is campaign promise to make the Taiwan economy grow by six percent a year.
[...]
The apology is unnecessary. It is uncalled-for. Everybody knows not just the Taiwan economy, but the whole world economy is facing a depression touched off by the U.S. financial meltdown. The campaign promise? Only incorrigibly optimistic fools believe every presidential campaign promise can be kept.
[...]
[Ma Ying-jeou] knows, and all clear-thinking people know, his campaign promise could never be kept, because it is impossible for anybody to whip the economy into line. [emphasis added throughout]
Gee, thanks for telling us this now, 9 months AFTER the election. Kinda makes you wonder though, what ELSE Hizoner was lying about. Because Ma sure made lots of promises . . .
Number one: Ma's promise to defend Taiwan's democratic form of government, judicial independence and freedom of speech. Was he lying about those things, China Post? Or when he promised he and his party wouldn't abuse the near absolute power given them by the electorate -- did he lie about that? Ma also professed to love Taiwan, too. Was there a whiff of dishonesty surrounding that statement, as well?
(We already know that Ma lied when he said wouldn't cover or remove Taiwanese national flags during cross-strait exchange events with China, so these are not idle questions.)
I'm all at sea. Because after all, only "incorrigibly optimistic fools believe EVERY presidential campaign promise that Ma Ying-jeou made". All "clear-thinking people" know the guy's gonna break at least SOME of those promises, right?
Am I being unfair? Maybe, but not very. Alan Greenspan and Larry Summers and some other very smart people were warning as far back as two or three years ago that a reckoning was coming in the U.S. mortgage industry. Perhaps Ma and his gang of seasoned economic advisers forgot to keep their ears to the ground. Or crack open a copy of a Wall Street Journal every now and then.
Somehow also, they neglected to notice the direction of oil prices, too. Fifty dollars a barrel, a hundred dollars a barrel, a hundred fifty dollars a barrel -- how high did Ma's wunderkins think the price could possibly go before it triggered a nasty recession?
Yes, the American financial crisis came a shock to many people, but a global recession because of skyrocketing oil prices was in the cards no matter WHAT happened in the States. Yet despite all those ill-portents, Ma's economic advisers continued to allow him to ludicrously promise Taiwanese voters that "everything will get better (economically) once Ma is elected."
To be blunt: Ma and his economic advisers are either incompetent . . . or they're liars. If they had no premonitions of an impending downturn then they're incompetent -- and not worthy of anybody's trust.
On the other hand, if they DID have an inkling of what was going to happen and still lied about happy days being here again, then they're liars. And again, not worthy of anybody's trust.
Speaking of trust, the China Post spilt much ink making exactly the same grandiose economic promises that Ma Ying-jeou did. Now the Post unashamedly comes forward and tells us that they, like then-candidate Ma Ying-jeou, were lying. Unlike Ma however, the China Post doesn't apologize for lying to its readership -- no, the Post actually adds insult to injury, and calls everyone who BELIEVES what the paper writes "incorribly optimistic fools"!
On that point at least, we can all agree.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postscript: Heh. Apropos of nothing, I came across this list of newspaper slogans. Particularly liked this one for the Nasha Canada news: "The newspaper for those who can read."
Somebody report those discriminatory elitists to a Canadian Human Rights Council, or something!
Oh, and then there was this one for the home-delivery department of the Detroit News: "We know where you live."
That's a line, I hear, the KMT may rip off for the next election.