First heard about this on Michael Turton's site. Saturday's Taipei Times tells the story:
The next day, Taiwan's China Post had more details:
O-kaaay. Here's one big clue in the original story all those geniuses seemed to miss:
. . . “They would do it doggy-style and every armchair zoologist knows that pandas favor the missionary position — when they do it at all. Their behavior caused chaos. Children screamed and parents became irate.” [emphasis added]
Now, the thing to remember is that newspapers are generally a bit Victorian in their use of language. No serious article will ever, EVER contain the expression, "doggy-style."
(The part about pandas favoring the missionary position should have been a dead-giveaway, too. Jeez, when I was 10 or 12 years old I knew that human beings were almost unique in the animal kingdom in their usage of the missionary position. * )
Speaking of that . . .
“The story carried incorrect information on panda behavior and could mislead the public,” he said. “The Taipei Zoo made a lot of effort to get the pandas at the zoo and we don’t want to see our efforts being destroyed.”
Golly, Mr. Yeh, maybe the truth is that your zoo just hasn't been doing a very good job in the education department. What have YOU been doing to inform zoo-goers that pandas prefer the, ah, ventro-dorsal position?
Glad to see the Taipei Times isn't apologizing to the likes of Jason Yeh and the Chinese Communist Party's paid mob of professional complainers. Folks've got a bad case of humor-deficit disorder if they can't laugh at lines like this:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* A quick google shows that a few other animals DO use the missionary (ventro-ventral) position. Mostly whales, it looks like -- and on rare occassions, chimps and gorillas.
Comments