No, not all of 'em. (Duh!) But the reaction of a number of them to the Dalai Lama's visit last week following Typhoon Morakot left a lot to be desired. From the Aug 30th edition of the Taipei Times:
-
This is not an appropriate time for the Dalai Lama to come,” said Master Ching Liang (淨良法師), chairman of the Buddhist Association of the Republic of China.
-
Cheng Ming-kun (鄭銘坤), vice chairman of the Jenn Lann Temple (鎮瀾宮) in Taichung County’s Dajia Township (大甲) . . . said that while many local religious groups have been working diligently to help victims, the move “erases local religious groups’ credit.”
-
Fo Guang Shan Monastery (佛光山), a Kaohsiung-based Buddhist monastery that helped many storm victims, declined to comment, while the spokesman for the Buddhist Compassionate Relief Tzu Chi Foundation (慈濟), another organization that has been helping victims, could not be reached for comments as of press time.
Granted some of these may be Sino-imperialists in the Chinese Communist Party's pocket, but Taiwan's China Post alluded to another dynamic at work -- good old-fashioned religious parochialism:
Buddhists in Taiwan are Mahayanists, not tantric Vajrayana followers. They, along with the Taoist majority, do not think tantric mantras and mudras would bring peace to the dead as well as the living. They are not pleased because they believe their priests can do a much better job than the Dalai, who could have stayed in Dharamsala and said as many masses as he pleased for the people of Taiwan.
Here the Post suggests opposition on the part of the laity where little actually existed, since it turns out that 75% of ordinary Taiwanese supported the Dalai Lama's mission to bring comfort to the survivors of the deceased.
Still, it stands to reason that the local CLERGY would believe that they could "do a much better job" than an outsider. Which reminds me of a story:
About a week after returning to the Old Country, an elderly uncle of mine died. Now, in his will he stipulated that an old fishing buddy of his (who happened to a minister) should be the one to give the service. These last wishes were complicated however, by the appearance of another minister, the man who apparently took excellent care of my uncle at the hospice. (I understand that the last few weeks were agonizing, once the cancer began attacking the nerve endings.) So this minister too, seemed to have good grounds for wanting to say a few words at the funeral.
The two might easily have come to an accomodation had it not been for yet ANOTHER minister. My uncle lived in a small town, where there was only ONE church of his denomination. And the head of this church was bound and determined that neither of these two interlopers would be given the opportunity participate in a ceremony on HIS home turf.
This crazy situation was only resolved when the family grew completely disgusted by the local minister's intransigence, and threatened to hold the service in the community center instead of his church. THAT made the local guy see reason -- real fast.
True story, that. Seems to me that Taiwanese Buddhist clergy (and Christian preacher-men!) bring discredit upon themselves during times of tragedy when the best they can do is act like mutts peeing on fence posts to keep the other dawgs out of their territory. A quick reminder to clerics of any religion: When people die and families are grieving, it's not all about YOU.
How do I track down a birds owner in Taiwan?
The tag only has a number on it, and the year. Nothing else.