Guess there's not enough Falun Gong members in Taiwan to fit the bill. From Friday's China Post:
The Presbyterian Church has been meddling in China's domestic politics for nearly a century. It has driven a wedge between the Chinese mainland and Taiwan by instilling hatred for mainland Chinese in the hearts and minds of Chinese on Taiwan.
Hard to figure out exactly what the author means by "China" here. First of all, if he means the Republic of China (Taiwan), then he's surely in error, because Taiwan was a colony of Japan a hundred years ago. Any "meddling" that might have taken place a hundred years ago would therefore have been in Japanese imperial affairs, not in China's domestic politics.
On the other hand, if by "China" the author is referring to the People's Republic of China, then again he's wrong, because Mao expelled all Western churches back in '49.
I'll assume then, that by "China" the writer means "Taiwan", and by "nearly a century", he means 60 years. That would suggest that the editorialist bears a grudge regarding the Presbyterians' opposition to human rights abuses by Taiwan's former dictators.
Such complaints by KMT apologists are a bit rich, however:
In 1975, after the KMT confiscated romanized Bibles and prohibited the printing of romanized texts, the [Presbyterian Church of Taiwan] issued "Our Appeal -- Concerning the Bible, the
Church and the Nation" which asked that the government respect religious freedom and carry out political reform.
Talk about meddling! In the 1970s the KMT dictatorship in Taiwan OUTLAWED Bibles written in the Taiwanese vernacular. In doing so, it violated two fundamental principles held by all modern democratic states: that of religious freedom and that of separation of Church and State. (Which should come as no surprise, because Taiwan in the '70s was no democracy.)
As for any "wedge" that has been driven between the Taiwanese and the Chinese, the writer conveniently forgets to mention any possible role that decades of Chinese belligerence and threats of war might have played in fostering anti-Chinese sentiment -- or that KMT anti-communist propaganda might have played a role as well.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE: Noticed a few similarities between this 2004 Bevin Chu blog post from a few years back and the piece in Friday's China Post.
Technically, it's not plagiarism, since I believe Mr. Chu wrote the Post's editorial as well. But it's still quite a long passage to simply CUT-AND-PASTE, however:
As part of his election campaign, Chen Shui-bian ordered Chen Yu-hao, former
chairman of the Tuntex Group and a fugitive exiled to the US, placed on Taiwan's
"Ten Most Wanted" list. Chen Shui-bian was desperate to cast himself as a
squeaky clean political reformer at Chen Yu-hao's expense.
A furious Chen Yu-hao responded by appearing on television and revealing the
ugly truth. Chen Shui-bian had eagerly pocketed a fortune in political
contributions from Chen Yu-hao over the past decade.
When Chen Shui-bian tried to deny the charges, Chen Yu-hao revealed that ROC
legislator Shen Fu-hsiung, a DPP "elder" with a reputation for honesty within
DPP circles was an eyewitness who saw Chen Yu-hao hand First Lady Wu Shu-chen a
bag full of cash.
Considering Shen was also Chen Shui-bian's campaign manager, Chen Yu-hao's
revelation put Shen in a somewhat awkward position. Rather than lie, Shen went
into hiding for the following week.
What happened next was like a scene out of a black comedy by Stanley Kubrick.
A delegation of ministers from the Presbyterian Church of Taiwan, a long time
abettor of Taiwan independence, paid an emergency visit to Shen. What textual
truth did these supposedly devout Christians share with him? They solemnly
assured Shen that it was not a sin to lie as long as it was in a good cause. In
other words, "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor, unless of
course it advances Taiwan independence."
Be that as it may, I cannot find any corroboration for Chu's story about Taiwan's Presbyterian Church. I can only speculate that Church leaders may have said something about "forgiveness" at the time (as Christians often do), and that Chu has misinterpreted -- or, to be less kind, twisted -- their statements to suggest the Church advocates the telling of deliberate falsehoods.
UPDATE (Dec 13/08): Mr. Chu's account of the Chen Yu-hao story appears a bit one-sided. From AsiaTimes Online:
In early February [of 2004] Chen Yu-hao faxed three letters to opposition legislators
claiming that he had made donations to the election campaign of President Chen
Shui-bian. At first he tried to claim that Chen Shui-bian had simply pocketed
the money, a claim that was refuted by officials from Chen Shui-bian's own DPP,
who produced photocopies of the receipts.
[...]
The DPP also pointed out that Chen Yu-hao had given donations 10 times as large to
both the other rival candidates for the 2000 presidential election; Lien Chan of
the Kuomintang (KMT) and James Soong, then running as an independent candidate
got NT$100 million each.
On top of this Chen Yu-hao had given another
NT$100 million to the KMT in the early 1990s, which somehow never made its way
into party coffers but ended up in the private bank accounts of Soong's family
members.
[...]
There is no doubt that Soong transferred NT$248 million of KMT funds into the
bank accounts of his family members in the Chung Hsing Bills Finance Corp, of
which NT$100 million came from Chen Yu-hao and another NT$80 million from
construction company boss Liang Po-hsun. Liang is also a fugitive from Taiwanese
justice, accused of embezzling money from the Overseas Chinese Bank. And while
Soong claims the money was to be used for party purposes, there is no evidence
that it was so used, and Soong never attempted to return the money - neither
when he left the KMT secretary-general's post nor when he left the party itself
in late 1999.